I like the pg_{import,export} names myself ... *nod*
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
>
> > > > As a result do people have any objection to changing pg_restore to
> > > > pg_undump? Or pg_load?
>
> Also possible would be a name like Oracle
> pg_exp and pg_imp for export and import.
> (or pg_export and pg_import)
>
> Load and unload is often more tied to data only (no dml).
>
> I agree that the current name pg_restore for its current functionality
> is not good and misleading in the light of WAL backup.
>
> Andreas
>
>
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org