On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > sounds good to me ... chr() == char(), I take it? is there a reason for
> > having both vs just changing char() to chr() in the odbc stuff?
>
> We don't control the ODBC specification ...
okay, granted, but, other then ODBC, do we need the char() type? could it
not be an internal translation in the ODBC driver itself?