Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От The Hermit Hacker
Тема Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ...
Дата
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0009072116070.527-100000@thelab.hub.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ...  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ...
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > I have a database where, periodically, I get a query that is producing
> > pg_noname files that are >1gig in size ... according to syslog, for that
> > process:
> 
> > Sep  7 18:36:39 pgsql postgres[47078]: DEBUG:  ExecRestrPos: node type 17 not supported
> > Sep  7 18:36:39 pgsql postgres[47078]: DEBUG:  ExecRestrPos: node type 17 not supported
> > Sep  7 18:36:40 pgsql postgres[47078]: DEBUG:  ExecRestrPos: node type 17 not supported
> > Sep  7 18:36:56 pgsql postgres[47078]: DEBUG:  ExecMarkPos: node type 17 not supported
> > %
> 
> This is the planner bug that I was just alluding to in other email ---
> the planner is trying to use a nestloop as the inner input to a
> mergejoin, and that doesn't work :-(.  But you only see the problem if
> the outer side contains multiple matches to a single inside tuple.
> 
> I have a fix for current sources; let me see if I can retrofit it for
> 7.0.*.

that would be perfect ... if we can get that retrofit'd, I'd be quite
tempted to put out a 7.0.3 for this, considering that its obviously not an
isolated incident ;(

Thanks ...



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ...
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ...