On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > Then why not just move 7.0 up to Mar/Apr (or even Feb/Mar) and plan on
> > the other new stuff for 7.1 if it's not ready?
>
> Even though we make pretty major changes for "minor releases", istm
> 7.0 should be the release which is the sum of what we've been working
> towards in the v6.x series. It would include WAL, outer joins,
> integrated date/time, reworked locking, referential integrity,
> reworked parse/query tree, yada yada yada...
But wouldn't much of that end up in a 6.6 release leaving considerably
less for 7.0?
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com flame-mail: /dev/null # include <std/disclaimers.h> Have you
seenhttp://www.pop4.net? Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop
Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================