On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, mlw wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Does this requested chagne have to do with Apache or PostgreSQL?
> >
> I suspect it is a request that live postgresql processes can linger
> around after a connection is completed and be re-assigned to a new
> connection as soon as one comes along. This will save the startup cost
> of a new postgresql process. This is what apache does.
I don't think is really going to provide much of an impact. Postgres
has to do a lot more initialization per session than Apache. Mainly
because Postgres has to deal with a stateful protocol, not a stateless one
like Apache. Besides, as already has been tested, session startup time is
minimal.
> --
> http://www.mohawksoft.com
Tom