Re: Non-standard feature request
От | Rocco Altier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Non-standard feature request |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.A41.4.21.0206141908200.325716-100000@apdev обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Non-standard feature request (Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Mike Mascari wrote: > That is what I want to do, except by extending the grammar. I must admit > to actually being surprised that a TEMP table created inside a > transaction lived after the transaction completed. That's when I looked > at the standard and saw that PostgreSQL's implementation was correct. I > would think for most people session-long temp tables are more the > exception than the rule. But I guess SQL92 doesn't think so. Regardless, > a couple of other people have shown some interest in the idea. I'll post > it to general as well as Tom suggests... > Actually, we needed to use temp tables that live beyond the transaction, because there are no session variables in postgres. So I did an implementation that used temp tables instead. Having the temp table not live for the life of the session would be a big problem for me. -rocco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: