Re: boolean 't' 'f' vs. '1' '0' - perl question
| От | Peter Haworth |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: boolean 't' 'f' vs. '1' '0' - perl question |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | PGM.20021231151127.541.2834@edison.ioppublishing.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | boolean 't' 'f' vs. '1' '0' - perl question ("Henrik Steffen" <steffen@city-map.de>) |
| Ответы |
help
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 15:18:08 +0100, Henrik Steffen wrote:
> I am just trying to (finally) upgrade from Pg.pm to
> DBI (DBD::Pg) ...
>
> Until today, Pg.pm delivered a 't' or a 'f' for
> true or false boolean values.
>
> Since the upgrade, DBI delivers a '1' or a '0'.
>
> Question: Does anyone know if there's possibly a
> parameter to set to tell DBI to deliver 't' and 'f'
> instead of '1' and '0' ?
Not in the current version. It looks like it should be easy enough to hack,
though. Just remove lines 1360-1362 of dbdimp.c:
if (16 == type) {
*val = (*val == 'f') ? '0' : '1'; /* bool: translate postgres into perl */
}
This will probably mean that tests will fail, but looks harmless enough
otherwise.
--
Peter Haworth pmh@edison.ioppublishing.com
"I don't have to impress you. And as you're an emacs weenie who
doesn't even speak Martian Swahili, I would never expect to."
-- Tom Christiansen
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: