Mark,
It's not canonical by any means, but what I do is:
update foo set thing='stuff' where name = 'xx' and thing<>'stuff';
insert into foo (name, thing) (select 'xx' as name, 'stuff' as thing where
not exists (select 1 from foo where name='xx'));
I believe if you put these on the same line it will be a single
transaction. It has the benefit of not updating the row if there aren't
real changes. It's plenty quick too, if name is indexed.
Thanks,
Peter Darley
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Mark Harrison
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 4:26 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] most idiomatic way to "update or insert"?
So I have some data that I want to put into a table. If the
row already exists (as defined by the primary key), I would
like to update the row. Otherwise, I would like to insert
the row.
I've been doing something like
delete from foo where name = 'xx';
insert into foo values('xx',1,2,...);
but I've been wondering if there's a more idiomatic or canonical
way to do this.
Many TIA,
Mark
--
Mark Harrison
Pixar Animation Studios
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings