RE: Added schema level support for publication.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com
Тема RE: Added schema level support for publication.
Дата
Msg-id OS0PR01MB61135AD9523243C4F4A32B38FBCB9@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Added schema level support for publication.  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Added schema level support for publication.  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Friday, August 27, 2021 2:13 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have implemented this in the 0003 patch, I have kept it separate to
> reduce the testing effort and also it will be easier if someone
> disagrees with the syntax. I will merge it to the main patch later
> based on the feedback. Attached v22 patch has the changes for the
> same.
> Thoughts?
> 

Thanks for your new patch. Here are some suggestions:

1. 
If a publication published a table and the schema where the table belonged to, the
publication name would show twice when using '\d+' for the table.
Maybe we should add some check to avoid the duplication. Thought?

For example:

create schema sch1;
create table sch1.tbl(a int);
create publication pub for table sch1.tbl, all tables in schema sch1;

postgres=# \d+ sch1.tbl
                                            Table "sch1.tbl"
 Column |  Type   | Collation | Nullable | Default | Storage | Compression | Stats target | Description
--------+---------+-----------+----------+---------+---------+-------------+--------------+-------------
 a      | integer |           |          |         | plain   |             |              |
Publications:
    "pub"
    "pub"
Access method: heap

2. doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml
@@ -6169,6 +6174,7 @@ SCRAM-SHA-256$<replaceable><iteration count></replaceable>:<replaceable>&l
        publication instead of its own.
       </para></entry>
      </row>
+
     </tbody>
    </tgroup>
   </table>

It seems that we don't need this change.

3. src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c

+    /* Complete "CREATE PUBLICATION <name> FOR SCHEMA <schema>, ..." */
+    else if (HeadMatches("CREATE", "PUBLICATION", MatchAny, "FOR", "ALL", "TABLES", "IN", "SCHEMA"))
+        COMPLETE_WITH_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_schemas
+                            " UNION SELECT 'CURRENT_SCHEMA' "
+                            "UNION SELECT 'WITH ('");

The comment should be updated to "FOR ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA".

Regards
Tang

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Multi-Column List Partitioning
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Some RELKIND macro refactoring