RE: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~)
От | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | OS0PR01MB5716D8847FC4773EFB3E248E94372@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~) (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday, December 4, 2024 2:22 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 11:05:43AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 7:39 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) > <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > >> It appears there is an additional memory leak caused by allocating > >> publication names within the CacheMemoryContext, as noted in [1]. And > >> it can also be fixed by creating a separate memctx for publication > >> names under the logical decoding context. I think the approach makes > >> sense since the lifespan of publication names should ideally align with that > of the logical decoding context. > > > > Yeah, I don't think we can go with the proposed patch for the local > > memory context as it is. > > Ah, indeed. I was missing your point. Would any of you like to write a patch > to achieve that? I can try to write a patch if no one else is working on this. Best Regards, Hou zj
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: