RE: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication

On Wednesday, July 23, 2025 12:08 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 3:51 AM Masahiko Sawada
> <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I've reviewed the 0001 patch and it looks good to me.
> >
> 
> Thanks, I have pushed the 0001 patch.

Thanks for pushing. I have rebased the remaining patches.

I have reordered the patches to prioritize the detection of update_deleted as
the initial patch. This can give us more time to consider the new GUC, since the
performance-related aspects have been documented.

One pervious patch used to prove the possibility of allowing changing the
retain_dead_tuples for enabled subscription, has not yet been rebased. I will
rebase that once all the main patches are stable.

Best Regards,
Hou zj