RE: bogus: logical replication rows/cols combinations

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
Тема RE: bogus: logical replication rows/cols combinations
Дата
Msg-id OS0PR01MB5716AD7C0FE7386630BDBAAB94D79@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: bogus: logical replication rows/cols combinations  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: bogus: logical replication rows/cols combinations  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Friday, May 20, 2022 11:06 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 7:54 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> 
> >  Even more to the point, how can we
> > have a subscriber do that by relying on view columns that don't exist
> > in older versions?
> >
> 
> We need a version check like (if
> (walrcv_server_version(LogRepWorkerWalRcvConn) >= 150000)) for that.

Thanks for pointing it out. Here is the new version patch which add this version check.

Best regards,
Hou zj
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Improve TAP tests of pg_upgrade for cross-version tests