On Wednesday, December 1, 2021 1:23 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 1:00 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 9:12 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > If so, the result from the second check_sql is unstable and it's
> > > probably better to check the result only once. That is, the first
> > > check_sql includes the command and we exit from the function once we
> > > confirm the error entry is expectedly updated.
> > >
> >
> > Yeah, I think that should be fine.
>
> Okay, I've attached an updated patch. Please review it.
>
I agreed that checking the result only once makes the test more stable.
The patch looks good to me.
Best regards,
Hou zj