RE: pg_dumpall anomaly
| От | Tim Mickol |
|---|---|
| Тема | RE: pg_dumpall anomaly |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | NCEEJEAEIDNFKBMALPGMMEFCCDAA.tmickol@combimatrix.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_dumpall anomaly (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
no possibility that it was a locally modified script. pg_dumpall came
straight out of the 7.1.2-2 PGDG binary rpm
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:11 AM
To: tmickol@combimatrix.com
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dumpall anomaly
"Tim Mickol" <tmickol@combimatrix.com> writes:
> what are the: <schema_name>|<schema_owner>| directives all about?
Good question. They look like an abbreviated select from pg_database,
but pg_dumpall shouldn't be doing any such thing. Is it possible you've
got a locally modified pg_dumpall script?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: