Re: Safe vm.overcommit_ratio for Large Multi-Instance PostgreSQL Fleet
От | Jorge Rodriguez |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Safe vm.overcommit_ratio for Large Multi-Instance PostgreSQL Fleet |
Дата | |
Msg-id | MW4PR05MB8748B984CEC4A9F1098C91848534A@MW4PR05MB8748.namprd05.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Safe vm.overcommit_ratio for Large Multi-Instance PostgreSQL Fleet (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
available
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2025 1:49:26 PM
To: Frits Hoogland <frits.hoogland@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>; Priya V <mailme0216@gmail.com>; pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Safe vm.overcommit_ratio for Large Multi-Instance PostgreSQL Fleet
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2025 1:49:26 PM
To: Frits Hoogland <frits.hoogland@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>; Priya V <mailme0216@gmail.com>; pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Safe vm.overcommit_ratio for Large Multi-Instance PostgreSQL Fleet
Note: This message originated from outside the FIU Faculty/Staff email system.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 11:14:34PM +0200, Frits Hoogland wrote:
> > As I said, do not disable swap. You don't need a huge amount, but maybe 16 GB or so would do it.
>
> Joe, please, can you state a technical reason for saying this?
> All you are saying is ‘don’t do this’.
>
> I’ve stated my reasons for why this doesn’t make sense, and you don’t give any reason.
>
> The article you cite does seem to point to general usage, not database usage.
Here is a blog entry about it from 2012:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://momjian.us/main/blogs/pgblog/2012.html*July_25_2012__;Iw!!FjuHKAHQs5udqho!KYC_U3_OpOjplPgrQZatREvJ8Ft3U7O30Lh6SH0uGMsTcYagWyupQLofwkNLDhhxgmzWzl6blB1HpFk0oj4$
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://momjian.us__;!!FjuHKAHQs5udqho!KYC_U3_OpOjplPgrQZatREvJ8Ft3U7O30Lh6SH0uGMsTcYagWyupQLofwkNLDhhxgmzWzl6blB1H1-eyJ3I$
EDB https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://enterprisedb.com__;!!FjuHKAHQs5udqho!KYC_U3_OpOjplPgrQZatREvJ8Ft3U7O30Lh6SH0uGMsTcYagWyupQLofwkNLDhhxgmzWzl6blB1HJNHkhfc$
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 11:14:34PM +0200, Frits Hoogland wrote:
> > As I said, do not disable swap. You don't need a huge amount, but maybe 16 GB or so would do it.
>
> Joe, please, can you state a technical reason for saying this?
> All you are saying is ‘don’t do this’.
>
> I’ve stated my reasons for why this doesn’t make sense, and you don’t give any reason.
>
> The article you cite does seem to point to general usage, not database usage.
Here is a blog entry about it from 2012:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://momjian.us/main/blogs/pgblog/2012.html*July_25_2012__;Iw!!FjuHKAHQs5udqho!KYC_U3_OpOjplPgrQZatREvJ8Ft3U7O30Lh6SH0uGMsTcYagWyupQLofwkNLDhhxgmzWzl6blB1HpFk0oj4$
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://momjian.us__;!!FjuHKAHQs5udqho!KYC_U3_OpOjplPgrQZatREvJ8Ft3U7O30Lh6SH0uGMsTcYagWyupQLofwkNLDhhxgmzWzl6blB1H1-eyJ3I$
EDB https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://enterprisedb.com__;!!FjuHKAHQs5udqho!KYC_U3_OpOjplPgrQZatREvJ8Ft3U7O30Lh6SH0uGMsTcYagWyupQLofwkNLDhhxgmzWzl6blB1HJNHkhfc$
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: