Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres:
От | Dennis Gearon |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: |
Дата | |
Msg-id | MLD8GAUQ09RO83NJC86C8MIXV97QKQ.3e551fa3@cal-lab обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Most of the specs I've seen haven't shown IDE raid to be that much faster. 2/20/2003 8:02:06 AM, "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com> wrote: >On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Christopher Browne wrote: > >> In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, greg@CopelandConsulting.Net (Greg Copeland) transmitted: >> > While I have read that many expect serial ATA to seriously challenge >> > SCSI I honestly have no idea where the rhetoric stops and reality >> > begins. I'd hazard a guess we'll really not know the whole truth until >> > samples become widely available from multiple sources including drives, >> > drivers, and host interfaces. >> >> I'd see Serial ATA being a "serious challenger" if it allowed you to >> cheaply build some "embarrassingly-parallel" RAID servers where you >> were able to get 16 drives hooked up, each on its own ATA 'bus' for >> about the price of 4-way SCSI. >> >> But the intended market is doubtless the super-price-conscious market, >> which naturally leads to the overall quality of the results being >> pretty compromised. > >These guys: > >http://www.ide-raid.com/ > >will probably make use of serial ata, since they're already making some >very nice, very fast IDE based RAID devices, and very dense (12 disk 3U >units.) > > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > >http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: