Re: PostgreSQL+ Beta bug?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bo?ena Potempa
Тема Re: PostgreSQL+ Beta bug?
Дата
Msg-id MKEIIFDEFPOPHIPFIFJCEEGADHAA.Bozena.Potempa@otc.pl
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostgreSQL+ Beta bug?  (Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-odbc
>If it is implemented in the server I would implement it.
>However, it isn't implemented in the server and so
>there's no recommended way to store 0s in strings now.
>Even if 0s are stored in strings accidentally like your
>example shows, there are few code which take them into
>account and they would be lost before long. As for me
>I've never minded 0s in strings in the backend coding.
>
>I don't think your request is unreasonable but what
>you should request the change first seems from the
>backend side.

I will ask on pgsql-hackers and then return to ODBC.

Thank you very much for your help.

Bozena Potempa


В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Graham Vickrage"
Дата:
Сообщение: Text field truncation problem
Следующее
От: Joan Picanyol i Puig
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: insert into view with a defined rule fails from MSAccess