>On the other hand, that's a poor way of using a relational database - can
>you
>explain what you are trying to achieve? Someone might have a better way to
>do
>it.
>--
> Richard Huxton
> Archonet Ltd
I'm using the database to store results from a numerical simulation, so the
first column of the data array would be 'time', then the next column(s)
would be population(s). There are about 1000 rows in each array.
I about thought putting each row of the array into a row in the table.
However, this could very quickly lead to a table with more than a million
rows. Would this be a problem?
Any suggestions welcome.
Thanks
Colin
_________________________________________________________________
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today!
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger