On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 11:08:32AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 05:44:57AM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> > Hi Bruce, Tom,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 03:43:32PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com> writes:
> > >> >> I was hoping someone more experienced with this would comment, but
> > >> >> seeing none, I will apply it in a day or two to all supported versions?
> > >> >> Have you tested this output back to 9.5?
> > >>
> > >> > I hoped that as well. No, I tested down to 9.6 because the change happened in 10.
> > >>
> > >> The patch assumes that parallel query is enabled, which is not true by
> > >> default before v10, so it should certainly not be applied before v10
> > >> (at least not without significant revisions).
> >>
> >> Yes, the behavior change was in 10. Before 10 the example is fine, I would not apply that to any prior version,
otherwisethe whole example needs to be rewritten.
>>
>> Agreed.
>This is not applying to PG 12 or earlier because the patch mentions JIT,
>which was only mentioned in the PG bloom docs in PG 13+.
Does that mean we need separate patches for each release starting with 10?
As I am not frequently writing patches, I would need some help here.
Regards
Daniel