> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Excellent idea. That's how temp tables worked, by bypassing the
> > syscache. I wonder if you could just prevent dropped columns from being
> > returned by the syscache. That may work just fine.
>
> No, it will break all the places that need to see dropped columns.
>
> I agree that a wrapper function is probably an appropriate solution,
> but only some of the calls of SearchSysCache should use it.
What like add another parameter to SearchSysCache*?
Another question: How do I fill out the ObjectAddress when trying to drop
related objects?
eg:
object.classId = ??; object.objectId = ??; object.objectSubId = ??;
performDeletion(&object, behavior);
Chris