Re: cash_out bug

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christopher Kings-Lynne
Тема Re: cash_out bug
Дата
Msg-id GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOCEKFCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: cash_out bug  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: cash_out bug
Список pgsql-hackers
> The issue here is (once again) that we're overloading type oid 0
> ("opaque") to mean too many different, incompatible things.  I've
> ranted about this before and will not repeat my previous remarks.
> The bottom line is that we need to eliminate "opaque" in favor of
> a set of pseudo-datatypes with different, crisply-defined semantics.
> We've had some discussions about it but no complete proposal has been
> made.  Since eliminating "opaque" is going to break just about every
> extant user-defined datatype, I'm not in a hurry to do it until we
> can get it right the first time...

I guess if anyone were to make a complete proposal, it would have to be you
then methinks...  Is it worth starting a thread about it at this stage?  It
is a pretty serious problem.

Chris



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Don Baccus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: OOP real life example (was Re: Why is MySQL more chosen
Следующее
От: Curt Sampson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: OOP real life example (was Re: Why is MySQL more chosen