RFC: Generating useful names for foreign keys and checks

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christopher Kings-Lynne
Тема RFC: Generating useful names for foreign keys and checks
Дата
Msg-id GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOCECACCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: RFC: Generating useful names for foreign keys and checks  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: RFC: Generating useful names for foreign keys and checks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

I'm thinking of doing a patch to generate foo_fkey and foo_chk names for
fk's and checks.  I know that this will make using DROP CONSTRAINT a whole
heck of a lot easier.  There have also been a few people who've complained
on the list about all the <unnamed> foreign keys, etc.

I know Tom had some fears, but I don't know if they still apply, or if
they're any worse than the current situation?

Can I go ahead?

Chris



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Neil Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: regression in CVS HEAD
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch