Re: Application name patch - v4

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dimitri Fontaine
Тема Re: Application name patch - v4
Дата
Msg-id FEC7C55F-74DB-4BFE-BAFA-BD8D3DAB5046@hi-media.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Application name patch - v4  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Application name patch - v4
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

Le 29 nov. 2009 à 18:22, Tom Lane a écrit :
>> I think we should use GUC_NO_RESET_ALL.
>
> I agree with you, but it seems we have at least as many votes to not do
> that.  Any other votes out there?

Driven by the pooler use case (pgbouncer, even), I'd say RESET ALL should reset also the application name. And the
connectionvalue is not tied any more to something sensible as soon as you have pooling in there... 

Regards,
--
dim


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication
Следующее
От: Brendan Jurd
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: cvs chapters in our docs