Guillaume,
I committed support for version 9.1 server. It seems it was almost as easy as Heikki suggested. Although, to test you
currentlyneed to build the driver from the main develop branch.
If you can find the time please build and try it, then report back
Kevin
On Feb 25, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Kevin Wooten <kdubb@me.com> wrote:
> I will look into support for 9.1. I started with 9.2 purely because it was the latest release at the time and I
thoughtit would take a whole lot longer to get to where we are at.
>
> On Feb 25, 2014, at 8:12 AM, Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Heikki,
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
>> <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
>>> That should be easy to fix. Looking at PGtype, where the query is coming
>>> from, all you need to do is add another version of the query without the
>>> reference to pg_range. The logic for sending a different version of the
>>> query depending on the server version is already there.
>>
>> I haven't taken a look at the code because IIRC they didn't want to
>> bloat the driver with support for old versions.
>>
>> From my point of view, 9.1 would be the perfect starting point as it's
>> still widely in production and it will probably stay that way for a
>> while. But there may be good reasons to not support it.
>>
>> If support for 9.1 is something they are interested in, we can take a
>> look at it. Just ping me.
>>
>> --
>> Guillaume
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc