Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
От | Daniel Gustafsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
Дата | |
Msg-id | FE299814-66B2-47B4-8F06-2B6A7AB508EF@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER (Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On 30 Apr 2025, at 19:59, Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 5:55 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote: >> Nitpick, but it won't be .so everywhere. Would this be clearar if spelled out >> with something like "do not rely on libpq-int.h when building libpq-oauth as >> dynamic shared lib"? > > I went with "do not rely on libpq-int.h in dynamic builds of > libpq-oauth", since devs are hopefully going to be the only people who > see it. I've also fixed up an errant #endif label right above it. That's indeed better than my suggestion. > I'd ideally like to get a working split in for beta. +Many > Barring > objections, I plan to get this pushed tomorrow so that the buildfarm > has time to highlight any corner cases well before the Saturday > freeze. I'll try to kick the tyres a bit more as well. -- Daniel Gustafsson
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: