Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?
Дата
Msg-id FCAE391C-741D-44B6-B765-4465388468D6@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?  (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
The sad thing us that I also did a patch for this and lost it. I think  
it wouldn't be too hard to convert all the call sites in the backend  
and provide a wrapper for other users.

greg

On 23 Oct 2008, at 08:59 PM, Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Well, aside from the gruntwork needed to convert all the core code  
>> that still uses the old APIs, there's the prospect of breaking  
>> extension modules that still use the old APIs.  It's kind of  
>> annoying to have two copies of that code, but less annoying than  
>> removing it would be ...
>>
>
> The problem with trying to deprecate it is that the vast majority of  
> the backend is still using the old interfaces, so people looking for  
> inspiration for their external modules will likely end up using the  
> old interface.  Like Alvaro I started this conversion a while ago,  
> got bored, and forgot about it.  If people do want this conversion  
> done while keeping the old interface around, I can track down that  
> patch, update it and finish it up for the next CommitFest.
>
> Kris Jurka
>
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SSL cleanups/hostname verification
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Multi CPU Queries - Feedback and/or suggestions wanted!