> On 7 Feb 2024, at 10:58, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> commit_timestamp_slru_buffers
>> transaction_slru_buffers
>> etc
>
> I am not sure we are exposing anything related to SLRU to the user,
I think we already tell something about SLRU to the user. I’d rather consider if “transaction_slru_buffers" is easier
tounderstand than “transaction_buffers” ..
IMO transaction_buffers is clearer. But I do not have strong opinion.
> I
> mean transaction_buffers should make sense for the user that it stores
> transaction-related data in some buffers pool but whether that buffer
> pool is called SLRU or not doesn't matter much to the user IMHO.
+1
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.