Re: Way to use count() and LIMIT?
От | SHELTON,MICHAEL (Non-HP-Boise,ex1) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Way to use count() and LIMIT? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | FB60DFB2C0E24449AC0C21F743B935410150F848@xboi02.boi.hp.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Way to use count() and LIMIT? (Joe Koenig <joe@jwebmedia.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
I'd be surprised if a cursor is the solution you want. A cursor is good if you want to "scan" through the rows one at a time via SQL rather than a client software program (e.g. PHP with ADOdb or something). If you wrote a function for your DB and needed to access data from a result of a query one row at a time (for calculating running totals or something -- bad example, but the point is the calculations need to be done _on_ the DB not the client) then a cursor is the way to go. Another thing about cursors is that they tie up the DB resources while they are open. And since I imagine you are wanting to have the client indicate when they want to scroll through the next 20 (another app/web request) that couldn't be done "inside" the DB with a cursor. By the way, even if you did use the cursor you'd still need to query the table first for the total count before accessing 20 rows at a time, so that's a moot point. Also, I'd be surprised if requesting the total count of rows in a table were really a hit at all (especially with no WHERE clause -- in that case the count is probably stored somewhere anyway and won't need to be calculated dynamically, again, just a guess, but probably true). Hope that helps, Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joe Koenig [mailto:joe@jwebmedia.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:29 PM To: SHELTON,MICHAEL (Non-HP-Boise,ex1) Cc: 'pgsql-general@postgresql.org' Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Way to use count() and LIMIT? I was currently using a LIMIT and OFFSET to move through 20 at a time. I need to know the total for 2 reasons: 1) To display it to the user 2) So my script knows whether or not to put a next button. I was hoping I could avoid 2 queries. Is the best way to do this to just use LIMIT and OFFSET in one query and just do a count() in the first? Does using a cursor offer any benefit over the LIMIT and OFFSET method? Thanks, Joe "SHELTON,MICHAEL (Non-HP-Boise,ex1)" wrote: > > You will also need to do a select first to get the total count. You can > store it in a var then pass it back to the user for each 20 or whatever > amount (so each time they know total) or pass it once, then create cursor. > > You can also use LIMIT with OFFSET to do a simple select each time for 20 at > a time. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Earl [mailto:jason.earl@simplot.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:27 PM > To: joe@jwebmedia.com > Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Way to use count() and LIMIT? > > Sure, just declare a cursor. Here's a simple one that I use: > > DECLARE raw_data CURSOR FOR > SELECT > (SELECT pc FROM curpack1 WHERE curpack1.dt <= caseweights1.dt > ORDER BY curpack1.dt DESC LIMIT 1) AS "pc", > dt::date AS "date", > dt::time AS "time", > weight AS "weight" > FROM caseweights1 > WHERE dt >= '%s' AND > dt < '%s' > ORDER BY dt; > > Then you simply fetch from this cursor (like so): > > FETCH FORWARD 20 IN raw_data; > > And you close it with a simple: > > CLOSE raw_data; > > Jason > > Joe Koenig <joe@jwebmedia.com> writes: > > > Is there a way to structure a query so you can only run 1 query, get the > > full number of rows that would be returned, but then use LIMIT to step > > through in groups of 20? For example, a search in my CD's/Rock section > > will return 53,000 results. I want to give the user the number of total > > results, but also use LIMIT to go through 20 at a time? Does this > > require 2 queries? Thanks, > > > > Joe > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: