"micro bucket sort" ...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hans-Jürgen Schönig
Тема "micro bucket sort" ...
Дата
Msg-id F90E257C-AD3B-4928-A90E-1DE67D432741@cybertec.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: "micro bucket sort" ...  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Re: "micro bucket sort" ...  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: "micro bucket sort" ...  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
hello all ...

i am bugged with a small issue which is basically like this ...

test=# create table t_test as select x, x % 5 as y from generate_series(1, 1000000) AS x;
SELECT
test=# create index idx_aaaaa on t_test (x) ;
CREATE INDEX
test=# ANALYZE ;
ANALYZE
test=# explain analyze select * from t_test order by x;
QUERYPLAN                                                              

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Index
Scanusing idx_aaaaa on t_test  (cost=0.00..30408.36 rows=1000000 width=8) (actual time=0.057..311.832 rows=1000000
loops=1)Totalruntime: 392.943 ms 
(2 rows)

we know that we get sorted output from the index and thus we do the index traversal here ...
if you add a condition to the sorting you will naturally get a sort in postgres because y is clearly now known to be
sorted.

test=# explain analyze select * from t_test order by x, y;                                                      QUERY
PLAN                                                       

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sort
(cost=141431.84..143931.84 rows=1000000 width=8) (actual time=1086.014..1271.257 rows=1000000 loops=1)  Sort Key: x, y
SortMethod:  external sort  Disk: 17608kB  ->  Seq Scan on t_test  (cost=0.00..14425.00 rows=1000000 width=8) (actual
time=0.024..143.474rows=1000000 loops=1)Total runtime: 1351.848 ms 
(5 rows)


same with limit ...


test=# explain analyze select * from t_test order by x, y limit 20;
   QUERY PLAN                                                           

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Limit
(cost=41034.64..41034.69 rows=20 width=8) (actual time=317.939..317.943 rows=20 loops=1)  ->  Sort
(cost=41034.64..43534.64rows=1000000 width=8) (actual time=317.934..317.936 rows=20 loops=1)        Sort Key: x, y
 Sort Method:  top-N heapsort  Memory: 26kB        ->  Seq Scan on t_test  (cost=0.00..14425.00 rows=1000000 width=8)
(actualtime=0.019..144.109 rows=1000000 loops=1)Total runtime: 317.995 ms 
(6 rows)

now, the problem is: i cannot easily create additional indexes as i have too many possible "second" conditions here.
what makes it even more funny: i don't have enough space  to do the resort of the entire thing (X TB).
so, a more expensive index traversal is my only option.

my question is: is there already a concept out there to make this work or does anybody know of a patch out there
addressingan issue like that? 
some idea is heavily appreciated. it seems our sort key infrastructure is not enough for this.
many thanks,
    hans

--
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: pgstat_report_waiting() in hot standby
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug / shortcoming in has_*_privilege