Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Brad DeJong
Тема Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows
Дата
Msg-id F8F0ED16CB59F247B7EFD0E1DB34BC1F5CB546DC@USALWEXMBX3.infor.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows  (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Change "even large" to "even larger" because it is used in a comparison.

> ... a reasonable starting value for <varname>shared_buffers</varname> is 25%
> of the memory in your system. There are some workloads where even large settings
> for <varname>shared_buffers</varname> are effective, ...

... are some workloads where even larger settings ...

Regards,
Brad DeJong

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Abbas Butt
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Using a latch between a background worker process and a thread
Следующее
От: Petr Jelinek
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Logical Replication WIP