> On 14 Apr 2023, at 16:20, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>
>> On 14 Apr 2023, at 15:51, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>
>> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>>> I mainly put save_errno back into SOCK_ERRNO for greppability, I don't have any
>>> strong opinions either way so I went with the latter suggestion. Attached v3
>>> does the above change and passes the tests both with a broken and working
>>> system CA pool. Unless objections from those with failing local envs I propose
>>> this is pushed to close the open item.
>>
>> One more question when looking at it with fresh eyes: should the argument
>> of X509_verify_cert_error_string be "ecode" or "vcode"?
>
> Good catch, it should be vcode.
And again with the attachment.
--
Daniel Gustafsson