Re: Pet Peeves?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Erik Jones
Тема Re: Pet Peeves?
Дата
Msg-id F877D5FB-0F1C-4F84-BCCB-08C1AC973E82@engineyard.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Pet Peeves?  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Список pgsql-general
On Jan 29, 2009, at 9:43 AM, David Fetter wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 05:18:19PM +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:
>> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
>>
>>> * No built-in ways to get the information psql gets.  "See what
>>> psql is doing" isn't an option when somebody doesn't have psql on
>>> hand.
>>
>> Uhm, what information are you referring to here?
>
> All the stuff that generates \d output is available only to psql.
> When somebody wants to make another client, or even expose some of
> that functionality, they pretty much have to roll it from scratch.

I'd say a good example close of this is the ability to generate full
create statements for database objects via an SQL command.  I.e.
shelling out to pg_dump is not always a fun option.

Erik Jones, Database Administrator
Engine Yard
Support, Scalability, Reliability
866.518.9273 x 260
Location: US/Pacific
IRC: mage2k






В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Pet Peeves?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Full backup - pg_dumpall sufficient?