Robert Treat wrote:
> On Friday 28 April 2006 12:09, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>>> "Larry Rosenman" <lrosenman@pervasive.com> writes:
>>>>>> I'd like to see a more concrete definition of what we
>>>>>> want Autovacuum to output and at what levels.
>>>>>
>>>>> autovacuum_verbosity
>>>>
>>>> Should we call it autovacuum_messages?
>>>>
>>>> In current usage...
>>>>
>>>> _verbosity controls how much information each message gives
>>>> _messages controls what types of messages are logged
>>>
>>> That probably works, but I'm not sure about the one to add the
>>> VERBOSE to the VACUUM commands autovacuum.c emits.
>>
>> does the following options satisfy everyone:
>>
>> autovacuum_messages=
>> none silent (nothing output at LOG level)
>> database we'd output a LOG message processing database <name>
>> table we'd output a LOG message for each table we actually vacuum
>> / analyze verbose we'd add the verbose flag to each command
>>
>> the lower levels would include the upper (I.E. verbose implies table
>> + database).
>>
>> If this is acceptable, I'm going to start working on the code to
>> implement it.
>>
>
> This would certainly be an improvement, but in the intrest of full
> discussion, I want to toss out a couple of ideas (they are only
> partially thought out, but I think could be useful)
>
> The first is to add a column(s) to pg_class to hold last
> vaccum/analyze time for each table. The upsides would be that this
> puts the information in a readily accessable place that can be viewed
> from third party tools and queried against for easier management
> along with accomplishing what the current logging is giving you.
I'm not so sure I have the catalog skill fu to do this, but am willing
to
do it, with some hand holding. breaking pg_class is not my idea of fun
:)
>
> The second is to add a "verbosity level" to pg_autovacuum for each
> table, to allow admins to configure specific tables for a more
> verbose logging. This way if you have a perticular table that needs
> additional logging, this could allow you to have only its vacuums
> emmitied at whichever log level seemed appropriate.
I was thinking about this as well, but wanted to see if others wanted
it.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman
Database Support Engineer
PERVASIVE SOFTWARE. INC.
12365B RIATA TRACE PKWY
3015
AUSTIN TX 78727-6531
Tel: 512.231.6173
Fax: 512.231.6597
Email: Larry.Rosenman@pervasive.com
Web: www.pervasive.com