Hello!
> 31 янв. 2016 г., в 17:18, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> написал(а):
>
> Костя Кузнецов wrote:
>> <div>Thank you, Jeff.</div><div>I reworking patch now. All // warning will be deleted.</div><div>About memory
consumptionnew version will control size of stack and will operate with map of little size because i want delete old
stylevacuum(now if maintenance_work_mem less than needed to build info map we use old-style vacuum with logical
order).</div>
>
> You never got around to submitting the updated version of this patch,
> and it's been a long time now, so I'm marking it as returned with
> feedback for now. Please do submit a new version once you have it,
> since this seems to be very useful.
I've rebased patch (see attachment), it seems to work. It still requires a bit of styling, docs and tests, at least.
Also, I thinks that hash table is not very good option if we have all pages there: we should either use array or do not
filltable for every page.
If author and community do not object, I want to continue work on Konstantin's patch.
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers