Re: problems with "Shared Memory and Semaphores" section of docs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Imseih (AWS), Sami
Тема Re: problems with "Shared Memory and Semaphores" section of docs
Дата
Msg-id F4131F24-A20F-4A04-B1A6-60242A7C7A43@amazon.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: problems with "Shared Memory and Semaphores" section of docs  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: problems with "Shared Memory and Semaphores" section of docs
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
> Any concerns with doing something like this [0] for the back-branches? The
> constant would be 6 instead of 7 on v14 through v16.

As far as backpatching the present inconsistencies in the docs,
[0] looks good to me.

[0] https://postgr.es/m/attachment/160360/v1-0001-fix-kernel-resources-docs-on-back-branches.patch
<https://postgr.es/m/attachment/160360/v1-0001-fix-kernel-resources-docs-on-back-branches.patch>


Regards,

Sami

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Tristan Partin"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: zlib detection in Meson on Windows broken?
Следующее
От: Andy Fan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Shared detoast Datum proposal