Re: A newbie's opinion - postgres NEEDS a Windows binary!
От | Mike Arace |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A newbie's opinion - postgres NEEDS a Windows binary! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | F367FPCfWp3v00iNh2V00008a91@hotmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | A newbie's opinion - postgres NEEDS a Windows binary! (cs1spw@bath.ac.uk (Simon Willison)) |
Ответы |
Re: A newbie's opinion - postgres NEEDS a Windows binary!
(Rich Shepard <rshepard@appl-ecosys.com>)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hey guys, Thats a great point Robert, and I have to agree with you. Postgres is by far my favorite open-source RDBMS system, and is the most capable I have found. The community is also perhaps the most vibrant I have seen. If you ask any question you will have an answer in 6 minutes flat. Its great. That being said, the lack of a native Windows version puts it at a distinct disadvantage when trying to gain access to new markets. A key area in which postgres could compete very favorably is among the "Access crowd" - the people who get that "free" database with the version of Office that comes on their new computers and then proceed to build their small businesses around it. (I mean free in the sense that they are already paying for Word and Excel, and in their eyes it is a part of the package) Access has nowhere near the functionality of Postgres, but it is "good enough" to put together a couple tables and forms to fill them out. User-interface issues aside, Postgres would be a great replacement for Access since it could scale much better, and has a very appealing price point. The only thing holding it back is the lack of a native windows version and inability to be installed by people who don't know POSIX from a fine clam sauce. Taking this from another angle, Postgres (with its relatively small footprint and robust features) could be a perfect embedded database for complex client applications, such as integrated CRM packages or fat clients for large distributed applications. The fact that the database can play with virtually any language only makes this more salient. Again, the lack of ability to deploy seemlessly on a microsoft platform is an issue in this area, since this little monopoly thing isn't going away anytime soon. Being in the same position as Robert, (not an active developer in the program) I can only offer this as advice at the moment, to be taken as it will. I'm curious to know, however, if there are any attempts out there to develop an abstraction layer for postgres or to port it to windows natively. From a commercial standpoint, these would be great projects to rally behind. While it may seem like a waste of resources for an open source project, more cross-platform capabilities = more users, more users = more commercial developers, more commercial developers = more resources, and more resources = more developement on Postgres itself. It's the gift that keeps on giving! None of this shouldn't be taken as a criticism. PostgreSQL is the best database out there for developers looking for a stable, fast, and expanding environment to build quick and flexible applications. It's in a great position to make a major impact in the industry. Just a thought. Regards Mike _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:
Предыдущее
От: "Brent R. Matzelle"Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A newbie's opinion - postgres NEEDS a Windows binary!
Следующее
От: "Andrew G. Hammond"Дата:
Сообщение: Re: One time only trigger/function on every row...