On Nov 11, 2010, at 10:19 AM, Darren Duncan wrote:
> I think that it would be best to implement MULTISET in the same way that a TABLE is implemented. Logically and
structurallythey are the same thing, but that a MULTISET typically is used as a field value of a table row. Aka, a
tableand a multiset are just different names for a relation, loosely speaking.
That sounds like a composite type to me.
Best,
David