Re: check (constraint) on point data type?
| От | Michael Glaesemann |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: check (constraint) on point data type? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | F19890E1-0639-48AD-A3B6-366BCF79DA69@seespotcode.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: check (constraint) on point data type? (Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-novice |
[Please don't top post as it makes the discussion more difficult to follow.] On Jul 24, 2007, at 16:10 , Jim Nasby wrote: > What's wrong with (NOT location <@ box '((0,0),(1,1))') ? Two reasons I didn't provide that answer: 1) On Jul 24, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Michael Glaesemann wrote: > I haven't looked at the geometric functions closely enough to see > if you could use some of those rather than defining your own > helper, but this should work. 2) I misread the specs and assumed that 0 and 1 values for x and y were to be rejected. I suspected that the geometric functions were inclusive rather than exclusive, which, upon experimentation, was correct. Right answer to the wrong specs :) # select not '(0,0)'::point <@ '((0,0),(1,1))'::box; ?column? ---------- f (1 row) Michael Glaesemann grzm seespotcode net
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: