RE: Is v7.1 stable enough?
От | Franck Martin |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Is v7.1 stable enough? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | F12ECEA0435AD211B5280008C7ACBC857FF3DF@BIGIRON обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Is v7.1 stable enough? (Jan Ploski <jpljpl@gmx.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is v7.1 stable enough?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
I would have a look on balsa which is a gnome mail client that use mysql for storing e-mails. May be it could be converted to PG. Franck Martin Network and Database Development Officer SOPAC South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission Fiji E-mail: franck@sopac.org <mailto:franck@sopac.org> Web site: http://www.sopac.org/ <http://www.sopac.org/> Support FMaps: http://fmaps.sourceforge.net/ <http://fmaps.sourceforge.net/> This e-mail is intended for its addresses only. Do not forward this e-mail without approval. The views expressed in this e-mail may not be necessarily the views of SOPAC. -----Original Message----- From: Jan Ploski [mailto:jpljpl@gmx.de] Sent: Wednesday, 14 March 2001 3:21 To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: [GENERAL] Is v7.1 stable enough? Hello, Not so long ago the feasibility of using PostgreSQL for archiving mail and news articles was discussed (briefly). I am planning to put the database to work for just that purpose on a web-based e-mail site (switching from MySQL whose table locking on INSERT becomes a performance bottleneck). To work around the 8 KB page limit, I would have to use the 7.1 beta version, though, or store messages in files and reference those files from the database. The latter solution does not really appeal to me, as it makes ensuring referential integrity a pain. My question is: how stable is the current 7.1 code? Can it be used in a production environment or is it meant for internal bug squashing only? Am I asking for problems? Thanks for your advice - JPL ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: