RE: GIS-type databases using PostgreSQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Franck Martin
Тема RE: GIS-type databases using PostgreSQL
Дата
Msg-id F12ECEA0435AD211B5280008C7ACBC857FF28A@BIGIRON
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на GIS-type databases using PostgreSQL  (Laurel Williams <tech@clearwater-inst.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Hi,

Me and others are planning to move PG to ISO19100 compliance. ISO19100 is
the future standard that is describing GIS systems.

If you visit FMaps.sourceforge.net and go in the CVS you will see in the
directory /src/geoobj/ procedures to add geographic data types to PG. These
procedures need to be rewritten as they are not ISO19100 compliant. But all
the concepts are there and working.

The work doesn't stop here and include metadata schema, feature schema, but
a the moment the crunch is creating  a geographic object type in PG and
rendering it.

Cheers.

Franck Martin
Network and Database Development Officer
SOPAC South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission
Fiji
E-mail: franck@sopac.org <mailto:franck@sopac.org>
Web site: http://www.sopac.org/<http://www.sopac.org/>
Support FMaps: http://fmaps.sourceforge.net/ <http://fmaps.sourceforge.net/>


This e-mail is intended for its addresses only. Do not forward this e-mail
without approval. The views expressed in this e-mail may not be necessarily
the views of SOPAC.



-----Original Message-----
From: Laurel Williams [mailto:tech@clearwater-inst.com]
Sent: Thursday, 1 February 2001 8:22
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] GIS-type databases using PostgreSQL


Hello,

Has anyone out there had experience designing/building GIS-related
databases using PostgreSQL? As a newbie approaching this topic, I would
really appreciate hearing from anyone who has (off-list, unless you
think it is of general interest).

TIA,
Cheers,

Laurel
tech@clearwater-inst.com

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvar Freude
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Is Oracle really so much faster
Следующее
От: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Is Oracle really so much faster