On 10/4/21, 8:19 PM, "Stephen Frost" <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> It's also been discussed, at least around the water cooler (as it were
> in pandemic times- aka our internal slack channels..) that the existing
> archive command might be reimplemented as an extension using these. Not
> sure if that's really necessary but it was a thought. In any case,
> thanks for working on this!
Interesting. I like the idea of having one code path for everything
instead of branching for the hook and non-hook paths. Thanks for
sharing your thoughts.
Nathan