RE: Good name for new lock type for VACUUM?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> 
> "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > Isn't it a better idea to have a separate 'SELF EXCLUSIVE' lock
> > which conflicts with only itself ?
> 
> *Only* itself?  What would that be useful for?

Isn't VacuumLock = RowExclusiveLock  + SelfExclusiveLock 
for the table ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue