Re: again on index usage

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hiroshi Inoue
Тема Re: again on index usage
Дата
Msg-id EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJEELLGHAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: again on index usage  ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From:  Hiroshi Inoue
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Kalchev
> > 
> > I tried this:
> > 
> > db=# explain
> > db-# SELECT sum(input), sum(output) FROM iplog_test 
> 
> > db-# WHERE 
> > db-# '2001-12-01 00:00:00+02' <= ipdate AND ipdate < '2001-12-02 
> > 00:00:00+02' 
> 
> Is there only one ipdate value which satisfies the above where clause ?

If '2001-12-01 00:00:00+02' is the unique ipdate value which satsifies
'2001-12-01 00:00:00+02' <= ipdate AND ipdate < '2001-12-02 00:00:00+02' 
and CREATE INDEX preserves the physical order of the same key,
the IndexScan would see physically ordered tuples. There's no strangeness
even if the scan is faster than sequential scan.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Hiroshi Inoue"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures
Следующее
От: Jan Wieck
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: FATAL 1: Relation 'pg_shadow' does not exist