Hi, Michael-san.
> From: Michael Paquier [mailto:michael@paquier.xyz]
> I have just committed the GUC and libpq portion for TCP_USER_TIMEOUT after a
> last lookup, and I have cleaned up a couple of places. It is a bit disappointing
> to see the option supported on Linux, but not on Windows, Solaris and BSD as
> far as I can see. Still that's useful in itself for more control of the TCP
> connection. Hopefully I forgot nobody in the review credits.
I confirmed your commitment. Thank you.
> I am marking the CF entry as committed. In the future, it would be better to
> not propose multiple concepts on the same thread, and if the socket_timeout
> business is resubmitted, I would suggest a completely new CF entry, and a new
> thread.
Thank you for your suggestion.
I think it would be better too.
Best regards,
---------------------
Ryohei Nagaura