That's bad.
Is there really no ohter way?
So it takes TWO termoral tables. Or even more?
And it can't be just sql because theres more around that statement.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Davis [mailto:sdavis2@mail.nih.gov]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 27. Jänner 2005 14:57
> To: KÖPFERL Robert
> Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [SQL] What's the equivalent in PL/pgSQL
>
>
> See this section of the manual:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/plpgsql-control-
> structures.html
>
> In particular, look at 35.7.1.2 and 35.7.4. I think you need
> to loop
> through the results of the query in order to return them. If
> you just
> want to return the result set as a whole to another function
> that needs
> to work with the data, you can use a cursor.
>
> Sean
>
> On Jan 27, 2005, at 7:46 AM, KÖPFERL Robert wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm trying to find an equivalent plpgsql function as this:
> >
> > func x returns SETOF "Tablename" AS
> > '
> > Select * from "Tablename";
> > ' language sql
> >
> >
> > How is this accomplished with plpgsql while not using a loop or a
> > second and
> > third temporal table?
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> > broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org
>