On Sep 6, 2006, at 6:41 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>>> Irrelevant details of the server configuration that do not
>>> directly affect those services aren't really something to gossip
>>> about on a public mailing list, though.
>>>
>>> The two are quite different things.
>> Andrew was apparently suggesting that the configuration issue he
>> mentioned is not irrelevant, and may be the actual cause of the
>> problems. Since he works for a domain registrar, I'm prepared to
>> assume, at least as a working hypothesis, that he knows what he's
>> talking about. At the least, I suggest it's wise to consider his
>> opinion rather than tell him it's not his business.
>
> Well, I can vouch for Andrew and his knowledge (not that he needs
> me to).
Enough. I didn't intend to insult anyone in this thread, merely
thought that one original comment was a little rude.
My apologies to anyone who's upset or been distracted. Lets go back
to database-related stuff.
Cheers,
Steve