On Feb 2, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Well, fair enough I suppose. Or it would be if you gave me an
> alternative that provides a simpler way to support those 3 upgrades.
I did: a naming convention with upgrade scripts that have the version number in them. You rejected it.
> Of course if that's too much for you, you can also choose to only
> support upgrades one versions at a time and provide only two scripts.
> Note also that I don't recall of any proposal on the table that would
> help with that situation, so I'm all ears.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-01/msg00296.php
Best,
David