> On 3 Sep 2020, at 12:19, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 09:47:07AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> I think this version is a clear improvement. Nothing more sticks out from a
>> read-through.
>
> Thanks for taking the time to look at it, Daniel. We of course could
> still try to figure out how we could group all dependencies without
> worrying about their type, but I'd like to leave that as future work
> for now. This is much more complex than what's proposed on this
> thread, and I am not sure if we really need to make this stuff more
> complex for this purpose.
Agreed, I think that's a separate piece of work and discussion.
cheers ./daniel