Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
Дата
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E48507FD@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers


-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org on behalf of Sander Steffann
Sent: Sat 10/29/2005 1:54 PM
To: josh@agliodbs.com; Tom Lane
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
>> You can have foreign keys between temp tables, just not between temp and
>> permanent tables.  The latter case is either fairly silly, or
>> technically hard, depending on which direction you have in mind.

> A temp table referencing a permanent table wouldn't be very silly IMHO...

Err, no, not silly, but difficult. But the other direction would be silly which is what I think Tom meant.

Regards, Dave


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Martijn van Oosterhout
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 8.1 Release Candidate 1 Coming ...