Re: unixODBC vs. iODBC

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема Re: unixODBC vs. iODBC
Дата
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40C392C@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на unixODBC vs. iODBC  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
> Sent: 09 July 2004 19:57
> To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
> Subject: [ODBC] unixODBC vs. iODBC
>
> Now that we have removed that "neither unixODBC nor iODBC"
> version of the Unix variant of the driver, you get
> uncontrolled breakage when you just run "./configure; make;
> make install".  I think it would be beneficial to add
> automatic detection of the available driver manager.
> That is:
>
> - if --with-unixodbc is specified, use unixODBC
>
> - if --with-iodbc is specified, use iODBC
>
> - if both are specified, abort
>
> - if neither is specified, search for unixODBC, then iODBC (I
> think that is the order of popularity; tell me if I'm wrong).
> If neither is found, abort.
>
> Comments?

Sounds perfectly sensible to me. Although not a user myself, my sense
from posts on the lists is also that unixODBC is the most popular.

Regards, Dave.

В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Gary Doades"
Дата:
Сообщение: Windows odbc driver build
Следующее
От: john@intelligentapps.com (Local Cuber)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Emergent: get table names from SageLine50 by ODBC